How does a student answer a peer review question?

Several named parts. Major comments, minor comments, a recommendation.

How is peer review marked?

By you, against the model answer and rubric you give, or by Procto AI when you ask it on an answer; the mark it saves is yours to keep or change.

Can Procto AI write peer review questions?

Yes: from a chapter, notes or a handout, in this shape, at the level of thinking you set, written from your material only if you say so.

Peer review

Major comments, minor comments, a recommendation.

Build one Graduate and doctoral

As the student meets it, replayed

Review the manuscript as a referee would.

Major comments

Minor comments

Recommendation

Each part marked against its rubric, released by you

The facts

Category: Graduate and doctoral. Research, defence, peer review.
The student gives: Several named parts
Marked: By you, or by Procto AI against your rubric when you ask
The prompt carries: Text, and anything you add
In the builder: Now.

Settings this template rules out

None. Every setting of a quiz applies to it.

About peer review.

Why this shape

Major comments, minor comments, a recommendation: peer review as a skill, practised on a real paper.

An example. Review the attached manuscript and recommend accept, revise or reject.

What it is

Graduate shapes ask for the work of research: synthesise several sources with citations, defend a position with evidence and counter-argument, critique a methods section, write a grant section, review a paper, answer an oral examination.

Why it is needed

Beyond the undergraduate years, assessment is about judgement and argument, and the shapes that serve a first-year quiz cannot carry it. These shapes hold several documents, long written answers and structured critique, and they mark against a rubric written for the discipline.

When to use it

Use them in postgraduate courses, doctoral training, research methods teaching, and wherever the assessment is a piece of scholarly work rather than a recall of facts.

How to write one well

Give the sources or the passage in the question. Write the rubric with the criteria the discipline uses: argument, evidence, method, originality, clarity. Set a word limit that matches the task.

For peer review in particular. Structure the answer into the three parts a journal expects.

Mistakes to avoid

A rubric so general that every answer is average. Sources too long to read in the time. A task that asks for a whole paper in an hour.

How EdProcto marks it

By a reader against the rubric: Procto AI where its grading is open, and always with the instructor's release. The sources and the answer stay with the attempt for the examiner.

Guides on peer review.

All the guides

Assessing graduate students: synthesis, critique and defenceFive short structured tasks for master's and doctoral students, each with a prompt and a rubric by part, and what research found on how far reviewers agree.

Questions.

How does a student answer a peer review question?: Several named parts. Major comments, minor comments, a recommendation.
How is peer review marked?: By you, against the model answer and rubric you give, or by Procto AI when you ask it on an answer; the mark it saves is yours to keep or change.
Can Procto AI write peer review questions?: Yes: from a chapter, notes or a handout, in this shape, at the level of thinking you set, written from your material only if you say so.

Also in graduate and doctoral.

The whole category

Synthesise sources

Several documents, one written synthesis with citations.

Defend a position

Claim, evidence, reasoning, counter-argument.

Critique the methods

A methods section annotated for weaknesses, with improvements.

Write a grant section

One section of a research grant, against a rubric.

Oral defence

An oral examination with several examiners.